Loss And Furor Take Toll On Obama, Poll Finds

I don't care for either of the percentages.

That this is the biased NYT, it says a load about where Obama currently stands. Now, of a sudden, Obama supporters are crying foul wherever you look while undertaking illegal robocalls attempting to keep the woman vote down and challenging a 527 supporting Hillary Clinton. Couple this with lawsuits filed by the RNC, DNC's partnership with Obama, and many other factors and you have a more potent combination against the Dems than ever seen before.

Amazing. Clinton wins by 10% in PA, and she's MORE disliked by men and others ... Obama is tarnished, and he continues to be the nominee of choice. Don't get that one. I noted that the "undecideds" in Indiana and North Carolina are larger in numbers, and a new poll showed the gap narrowing in North Carolina. I believe that there are now suspect numbers in anything saying Obama will win most Democrat votes in the next four primaries coming up. I don't believe, for instance, that voters in IN, WVA, KY and North Dakota really will buy Obama's tripe any longer. Yesterday, for the first time, I heard John King state, that by Gosh, if Obama really told Rev. Wright on the day he announced his candidacy, that he [Obama] felt it necessary to put some distance between he and Wright, because some of Wright's rhetoric was "pretty tough," then perhaps Obama was just as calculating a politician as ... oooooops! Senator Clinton??? And what are the chain of events there in that decision? Could it be that Rev. Wright was feeding back to Obama the very words Obama used on him ... that politicians sometimes have to say things that they need to say v. what they want(ed) to say ... namely, "he says the things he says because he's a politician, and I say the things I need to say, because I'm a pastor." Maybe Rev. Wright had already felt thrown under the bus more than enough!!! Maybe he HAD warned Obama ... I'm not going to allow a life time's work to be trashed when I KNOW what you told me the day you announced! Obama, in case folks haven't noticed, takes a visible "sag" in his demeanor and bounce, when things like this happen. He doesn't do well with criticism; he doesn't do well losing; he doesn't do well taking hard attacks on his campaign, as with the Rev. Wright controversy, and the veracity of the anger and outrage experessed about his "spiritual mentor." On NEWSMAX today, there's an article which purports Rev. Wright wasn't as maligned an individual in his youth as he has led Obama to believe. Won't it be something if the poor attacked Rev. actually made up a fair amount of his biography, in order to qualify as a "Black Liberation Theologist." Rev. Wright undoubtedly has more to say on this ... and surely, someone will score an exclusive. After all, he has that $10M home to care for now. If there are more nasties which emerge about Rev. Wright, his beliefs, comments, assumptions, lies, truths ... Obama will continue to be asked questions ... each time, driving another nail in his once invincible coffin. He'll not get my vote. He is a phony, and is just as cold and calculating as he accuses Senator Clinton of being. The Dems will lose I'd urge Clinton supporters to pledge some of their rebate checks to her campaign fund. And, to stay on top of new revelations which emerge about the Rev. Wright-Obama connection. My guess is, if Clinton has moved up in the North Carolina polls, she could be dead even with Obama next week. If she beats Obama, or ties him in both, that's an improvement for her. Remember now, how this has consistently gone: She's ahead in PA. She ONLY wins by 10% points, instead of the 20% or more that she once held the lead. If she ties him in NC, or IN, or both, then she'll have somehow lost both elections ... the "spread," you know ... will continue to make him the algebraic winner. I would urge Clinton supporters or even those who are on the fence, to look at her ability to lead and lead from the start, vote for her, and hopefully, take her solidly into the winner's column in IN, NC, and soon ... WVA, KY, and ND. If she could win all five of those, my guess would be, she'll be ahead in total votes cast, and coming even with the delegate race, too. If the Superdelegates want to vote against the will of the people, let them. It will be the ruin of the best chance to win the congress and white house in many years. If the Dem superdelegates are that stupid, let them go at it.
http://www.newsmax.com/kessler/obama_wright/2008/04/28/91553.html

write a thesis ;)

insightful commentary contained in that post?
----
ROFL

Senator Barack Obama's aura of inevitability...

This is really bad, self-aggrandizing "reporting" by the New York Times. I'm not sure Obama ever had an "aura of inevitability;" or Hillary, for that matter. I think the media made this @!$%# up about the candidates having "an aura of inevitability," whatever that means. Both candidates campaigned and worked hard throughout and continue to.

The Times can be accurate and say his lead appears to be diminishing, but that wouldn't be fun.

yeah wasn't hilary the all but inevitable candiate.. everyone said it gop and dems alike I guess there were cjinks in her armour as well huh?
People used to freak when we talked bad about hilalry and yet she did the distasteful things like campaigning in florida
but you know what ever.. it will be an interesting race.
hilary still should have dropped out. the only way she can win is if super delegates change sides or go against the popular vote.

Hillary Clinton Rev. William Procanick put his hand on the Bible during his sex-abuse trial in Oneida County Court earlier this year, he swore to tell the whole truth and nothing but the truth. Where is the Outrage

gpnavonod

--
Alphabetical thesis --

True,but the saying goes '' people with logs in their eyes can't point to the specks in others ''

--
After you've finished cleaning the floor
--

Arrested in cetacean era.